Friday, February 25, 2011

BiSciCol Technical Meeting: University of Florida, 23-24 February 2011


The BiSciCol Technical team had a successful brainstorming meeting over two warm Florida days.

Attendees:
Nico Cellinese (UF), Kate Rachwal (UF), Reed Beaman (UF), Gustav Paulay (UF), Russ Watkins (UF), John Deck (Berkeley), Brian Stucky (Colorado University), Rich Pyle (remotely, Bishop Museum) and our very special guest Steve Baskauf (Vanderbilt University).

The main goal of the meeting was to define the BiSciCol scope, techcnical goals and the model. Happy to report we made great progress. We are now ready to move to an implementation phase and are confident will be able to release a prototype in July 2011. See below a snapshot of out design document.

Purpose of the System
1. Notify all objects that are related to Object X that Object X has changed.
2. Manage relationship definitions between objects that exist in distributed databases.
3. Manage annotations of objects where annotation is treated as an Object relationship.

Technical Goals of the System
1. scalable design
2. easy coding but must be robust
3. expandable to different domains

Envisioning this as a distributed network with structured content defined. Goal is to allow for multiple data sources, each with their own thematic content. The thematic content is built on defining relationships between objects.

The Model
Linkages between objects is unstructured which allows any object to be tied to any other object via the predicate “relatedTo”. This is similar to SKOS “related” but we have made relatedTo transitive. relatedTo does not require objects to be organized hierarchically.

Following are the triples recognized in the network:

:objectId :relatedTo :objectId
:objectId rdf:type :objectType

:relatedTo :hasProperty :propertyDefinitionURI
:objectId dwc:dateLastModified “YYYY-MM-DD”

Monday, February 14, 2011

News and updates

Since our last meeting in Washington, DC we worked out some of the object relationships and how we want to formalize concept/objects such as individuals, specimens, vouchers etc. for the purposes of our network. We also agreed to consider implementing RDF in our design. To this end, a number of people have since purchased and read (hopefully past the introduction) the book "Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL". Finally, we agreed to deliver a working prototype of the BiSciCol network in July 2011, implementing data from Biocode, CalPhotos, and UF.

During January and the first part of February, John Deck (Berkeley), Rob Guralnick (Colorado U.), and Brian Stuckey (Colorado U.) have been crafting a technical implementation plan for the BiSciCol prototype. CU has offered a server and Tomcat instance for our prototypes and Brian has been implementing that along with getting the web interface going. John has been working on a model that ties together collecting events, specimens, tissues, DNA extractions, and photographs (more object types later), while incorporating location and modification date. Taxonomy is notably absent for now and we will soon be working more closely with Rich Pyle and Rob Whitton (Bishop Museum). Codebase is Java and inferencing/RDF work being implemented in Jena/ARQ (open source Java).

On the 23rd and 24th of February, John and Brian will be at UF for a technical meeting with Nico Cellinese, Kate Rachwal, Russ Watkins, and special guest Steve Bauskauf (Vanderbilt University) to review the UF implementation and proposed model. We will also work remotely with Rich Pyle and Rob Whitton. More details on this meeting will be posted soon. Given our prototype deadline of July 2011 we have a lot of ahead of us, especially in integrating taxonomic names components but we feel we are on target with progress to date.

Monday, January 31, 2011

16-17 December 2010 - Meeting outcome

Our December Meeting brought us all together and we were fortunate to have Davie Vieglais from DataOne and Bob Morris from FilteredPush (a.k.a. Push-me-pull-you).  We reviewed use cases and case scenarios, discussed object relationships and ways to model them.  


We are making progress with designing a technical architecture and on February 23-25, 2011 John Deck (Berkeley), Brian Stuckey (U. Colorado), Kate Rachwal (UF), Russ Watkins (UF), Nico Cellinese (UF), and our guest Steve Baskauf (Venderbilt) will meet at the Florida Museum of Natural History to refine solutions to some of the impending technical issues.


We created a number of subgroups that will be in charge of developing specific aspects of the project:


1. Taxonomic Names (Rich Pyle [chair], Gustav Paulay, Tom Orrell, Chris Meyer, Nico Cellinese, John Deck, Jonathan Coddington, Rob Whitton).
2. Ontology  (Nico Cellinese [chair], Bob Morris, Kate Rachwal, John Deck, Jonathan Coddington, Rich Pyle).
3. Geospatial (Rob Guralnick [chair], Reed Beaman, Russ Watkins, Kate Rachwal, John Deck).
4. Technical Architecture (John Deck [chair], Rob Whitton, Dave Vieglais, Kate Rachwal, Rob Guralnick, Russ Watkins, Tom Orrell, Bryan Heidorn, Jonathan Coddington).
5. Domain Scientists (Chris Meyer [chair], Nico Cellinese, Gustav Pailay, George Roderick, Neil Davies, Rob Guralnick, John Deck, Tom Orrell, Jonathan Coddington, Reed Beaman). Improve on test case list.
6. Sustainability Group (Neil Davies [chair], Rob Guralnick, Reed Beaman, Chris Meyer).
Reed Beaman, Rob Guralnick and Russ Watkins are compiling a conceptual plan that will include specifics on who is doing what, timeline, and priorities. We all agreed to deploy a prototype in July 2001 for testing by the community.

More later.....

Friday, December 17, 2010

Meeting in Washington DC, 16-17 December, 2010

We had a great, productive, fun meeting and notes will be posted soon.  In the meanwhile, I wanted to expose another inconvenient truth: informatics and technology are not always best friends. Check this out!



Here in the above "picture": Chris Meyer, Tom Orrell, Rob Guralnick, John Deck, Neil Davies, Gustav Paulay, Bob Morris, Jamie Whitacre, Kate Rachwal, Meghan Parker, and Nico Cellinese. Additional participants were Dave Vieglais, Reed Beaman, John Keltner, Linda Ward and Jon Coddington. "Photograph" taken by Reed Beaman.




Thursday, December 2, 2010

BiSciCol Technical Architecture


Here is a quick diagram showing BiSciCol proposed architecture. Click the image to see the details.

More information and code is at the Google Code Page.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

NSF original proposal

The original proposal submitted in July 2009 to the Division of Biological Infrastructure (DBI-BRC) can be downloaded here: 

BiSciCol Tracker: Ready, set, go!

BiSciCol (Biological Science Collections) Tracker is a recently funded NSF project (September 2010) with the goal of building an infrastructure designed to tag and track scientific collections and all of their derivatives.

Scientific collections created and used in basic research are an integral part of our scientific infrastructure. Individual specimens in these collections serve as the anchor for an expanding array of information that grows and changes with time about the specimen and the group that the specimen represents. Unfortunately, as we all know, specimens and subsamples are scattered geographically across institutions. Taxonomic, genomic, geospatial, and other information about the specimens is also scattered across independent computer systems and on paper, and are very difficult to access or synthesize. Current data sharing systems such as DigIR are one-way channels and do not allow for quick and easy two-way linking of information or updates as new knowledge is gained.

The BiSciCol team will take the appropriate next steps to address a community-wide challenge facing the biological collections community – linking and tracking scientific collection objects (specimens, sequences, images, etc.) and their digital metadata across multiple institutional collections with heterogeneous information management systems. In current distributed data systems (e.g., GBIF, MANIS, HerpNET, ORNIS), information is passed one-way from data providers to users. No mechanism exists to tag or annotate collection objects and link information to other collection objects or data records and back to the original collections. Our deliverables include 1) develop a tracking and annotation system based on globally unique identifiers (GUIDs) and ontological relationships; 2) deploy this system and others in a Virtual Information Appliance (VIA) as a Virtual Machine (VM); and 3) document and implement a set of use cases and practices, based on characteristic physical and digital workflows in the community.

The need to provide access to validated biodiversity information has been documented in a number of workshops, reports, etc., but as yet there is no single implementation that would support collections and research information management using the proposed approach. BiSciCol is designed on the simple premise that changes to data objects are trackable with GUIDs, and that semantic relationships are assignable and discoverable among physical and data objects, for example when a specimen is imaged or sampled for DNA extraction. Ultimately, this project enables discovery, accessibility, and networking of collections, in order to advance semantic interoperability for collection information systems. 

Our deliverables are designed to benefit the entire biological collections community by taking initial steps to implement core information infrastructure based on established challenges in the community. Collections data are critical to land management decisions, maintenance of biodiversity, and analysis of the causes and consequence of climate change. Finally, we will actively engage use communities through training workshops, summer student internships, and community BioBlitz enhancements.

Who we are: The BiSciCol collaborative represents a broadly trained team of biologists, collections curators, and information and technology specialists. Our team includes 6 Institutions (University of Florida, The Smithsonian, University of California, Berkeley, University of Colorado, Boulder, University of Arizona, and The Bishop Museum, Hawaii) and 15 Investigators (Nico Cellinese, Jonathan Coddington, Neil Davies, John Deck, Rob Guralnick, Bryan Heidorn, Steve Manchester, Chris Meyer, Tom Orrell, Gustav Paulay, Rich Pyle, Kate Rachwal, George Roderick, Russell Watkins, Rob Whitton, and Norris Williams).

Needless to say, we are anxious to start!